B is also wrong. I will explain why:
Argument gives that there is a correlation between higher education andincome.
However there is nothing in the argument that express that could be possible someone have lower education and higher income
A correlation could be 100%, and is still possible that everybody that have higher education also have higher income, thus the B is wrong, is not a fact that could be concluded with the premises if you can have a negative case.
B would be correct if the question
...
Argument gives that there is a correlation between higher education andincome.
However there is nothing in the argument that express that could be possible someone have lower education and higher income
A correlation could be 100%, and is still possible that everybody that have higher education also have higher income, thus the B is wrong, is not a fact that could be concluded with the premises if you can have a negative case.
B would be correct if the question
...
.jpg)
