GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) | Lobster problem (CR)

No doubt answer is E.
It s is possible to attack a causal argument identify that certain causes bring to a different effect (than that one stated in the argument).

-In the arguement the effect is: proposal is pointless because lobsters don't live enough ...
- E states that human are harmed by lobster's disease and so lobster lieve long enough to be harmed and to harm consequently.

And so E works as a counter example.

Matt

Posted from my mobile device
...

---