Arvind
In B, 'that' acts as a relative clause connector, which I feel is acceptable in reported speech. You see the mention doesn't obscure the intended meaning in any manner. In other cases, the connector is not stated but clearly understood.
Why do you feel it is wrong? Is it a grammar problem or meaning problem?
Some may even feel that the whole structure 'humans are' is a comma splice since there is only a comma that separates two IC. However, because of the implied nature of the connector,
...
In B, 'that' acts as a relative clause connector, which I feel is acceptable in reported speech. You see the mention doesn't obscure the intended meaning in any manner. In other cases, the connector is not stated but clearly understood.
Why do you feel it is wrong? Is it a grammar problem or meaning problem?
Some may even feel that the whole structure 'humans are' is a comma splice since there is only a comma that separates two IC. However, because of the implied nature of the connector,
...


.jpg)





