RonPurewal wrote:
^^ No need to bookmark that problem. This one is an improved version of that one (which, upon review, had some noticeable faults).
It may even be a worthwhile exercise to examine what I changed—and consider WHY I made those changes.
Hey Ron, good to see you, hope you've been doing well!
I wrote a post in that earlier thread about some of the issues with the first version of this problem, if anyone is curious, though as Ron suggests, you'll learn most by thinking about it on your own first,
...
.jpg)
