I'm not sure where it's from (it's from one of those old 1000 series documents with questions from various sources), but it might be an LSAT question.
You don't need to know exactly what "binding arbitration" means here. You just need to know: they can settle things by one method (strikes and negotiations) or by another method (arbitration). It's not important what those methods actually are.
The argument's conclusion is: governmentsshould only ban strikes for essential workers.
...
You don't need to know exactly what "binding arbitration" means here. You just need to know: they can settle things by one method (strikes and negotiations) or by another method (arbitration). It's not important what those methods actually are.
The argument's conclusion is: governmentsshould only ban strikes for essential workers.
...
.jpg)
