Could someone please comment on 117 regarding answer D ?
if the density of the "observable universe" (defined in the passage as "luminous matter in the form of galaxies")com[ing] to a small fraction of the[necessary 3 hydrogen atoms/cubic meter] forms the basis for the assertion that "there must be enough INVISIBLE (nonluminous) matter in the universe to exceed the luminous matter by a density by a factor of roughly 70", then wouldn't this density estimate of the observable universe being understated (as
...
if the density of the "observable universe" (defined in the passage as "luminous matter in the form of galaxies")com[ing] to a small fraction of the[necessary 3 hydrogen atoms/cubic meter] forms the basis for the assertion that "there must be enough INVISIBLE (nonluminous) matter in the universe to exceed the luminous matter by a density by a factor of roughly 70", then wouldn't this density estimate of the observable universe being understated (as
...



.jpg)

