adkikani wrote:
Hisonikavadhera
I used similar approach to yours but can you validate my below reasoning
on the lines ofRaghavSingla in above post:
M A E
17 25 x before acquisition
22 20 x-5 after acquisition
Let's leave E since we know it is acquired by A and as such had less casinos than A and M
Now my goal of weakening the argument should be to weaken the prediction that
A does not have maximum no of casinos
This is possible if option (A)
...






