The argument talks about cutting taxes for low-income families, which indirectly increase the take-home pay.
It also states that this plan will benefit low-income families. If we are able to show that implementing this plan
does not benefit the low-income families in some way, we can weaken theargument.
Option C(The tax reform plan will eliminate a food subsidy program that granted low-income families $100
per month in food vouchers) does just that and is the correct answer.
...
It also states that this plan will benefit low-income families. If we are able to show that implementing this plan
does not benefit the low-income families in some way, we can weaken theargument.
Option C(The tax reform plan will eliminate a food subsidy program that granted low-income families $100
per month in food vouchers) does just that and is the correct answer.
...





