So, this is how I went about it.
Background: Discount Stores might close because of competition from "Spendless"
Conc: The discount stores won't stay for long. ( Reason: A new store has opened in place of every store closed because it could not compete against Colson)
Fact: Stores closed in a period of 5 years.
What can we infer from the Conc and the Reasoning and Fact?
1. the stores that closed couldn't hold the competition against colson, which means Colson has a competitive advantage
...
Background: Discount Stores might close because of competition from "Spendless"
Conc: The discount stores won't stay for long. ( Reason: A new store has opened in place of every store closed because it could not compete against Colson)
Fact: Stores closed in a period of 5 years.
What can we infer from the Conc and the Reasoning and Fact?
1. the stores that closed couldn't hold the competition against colson, which means Colson has a competitive advantage
...
