harshdeep12 wrote:
mikemcgarry : Dear Mike, Hope you are doing great. Can you please help me understand why option D is wrong? See, I undertand the logic behind option B. The argument talks about total people that contracted the disease. And people contracting = Treated + Untreated. So in a way option B is very dear to the argument because it suggests that despite the total increase in treated patients, the total number of cases can still be low in the succeeding month. For example:
1. Month 1: 600(Treated) 400(untreated)
...
