VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Hey arvindg,
Thanks for pointing that out. The explanation is indeed incorrect. Sometimes, errors just creep up unwittingly. We will fix it soon. Your strategy of using numbers was spot on and that's exactly what I was thinking while reading the question too... Though the switch from <100 to >100 takes place at decimals so I was a little unhappy about that. The algebraic solution given by Bunuel is neat.
VeritasPrepKarishma
hi mam
for statement 1, we cannot set x to equal to y, as any
...








