pratik1709 wrote:
I got this Question... Still can anyone please explain what is wrong with Option A....
conclusion ==there is no economic rationale for requiring further reductions in automobile emissions--we need to weaken
we need to prove that there is some economic benefit , if laws are amended or added ...
Now A is simply telling --economic factors should not control the decision making process.-- it does not weaken conclusion. it is not pointing that if laws are amended , there will be some benefit ...As
...
.jpg)






