Nightmare007 wrote:
tanvi9 wrote:
Mahmud6 wrote:
By negating D, we get
If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?
If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?
I have the same doubt, because I choose D over E by applying negation only. otherwise if I just select on the basis of prethinking 'E' is a better option!
someone pleaseexplain!!
Hi,
I think my approach will help you.
MY analysis .
Premies : Increased T.V ----> not good reading lvls
Conclusion : Decrease in T.V
...
![FLO – Therapy at the Club – Pre-Single [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Music221/v4/a4/11/88/a41188ed-0f2e-e8d5-1163-d59e373cc58c/26UMGIM30046.rgb.jpg/208x208bb.webp)
.jpg)
