Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: Health care advocate: The advantages of eating fish are many

I misspoke in my last post. I swapped D for B, but D is the correct answer. Option D shows us that if you meet yourrequirement(Option D here only speaks about omega 3, what about the other benefits of having fish, as it is mentioned in the premise? How would one get access to the other multiple benefits? ), you do not need to eat more (which is the conclusion). Thus, this weakens the argument substantially. You are somewhat correct that B does weaken it from a health standpoint,