Bunuel wrote:
ttaiwo wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm still a little confused...I tried plugging in either x or y in order to get the required answer and failed miserably...can Bunuel et al give a more granular explanation please?
Thanks
I'm still a little confused...I tried plugging in either x or y in order to get the required answer and failed miserably...can Bunuel et al give a more granular explanation please?
Thanks
Can you please tell me what is unclear in the solution? Thankyou.
Thanks for your response...I did the second substitution as you said but ended up with:
y = x-b/k ...even tried to expand that even further...and got y= x/k - b/k
In effect I don't know how you ended up with:
y=1/k∗x−b/k
I
...
.jpg)
