bigtooth81 wrote:
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
Though I did this question wrong initially, as the intended meaning was NOT clear to me. Let me try to help. Understanding the intended meaning is the key to solve this question correctly.
Defense attorneys are attributing their clients' indigestion (or food poisoning/alergy) to their misbehavior (criminal or delinquent behavior). However, this attribution is leading to a conclusion that the culprits are not responsible for their actions.
...
![FLO – Therapy at the Club – Pre-Single [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Music221/v4/a4/11/88/a41188ed-0f2e-e8d5-1163-d59e373cc58c/26UMGIM30046.rgb.jpg/208x208bb.webp)
.jpg)
