omer1kau wrote:
who decided that 350 is rounded up and not down?
is that common knowledge?
I though that you can round 350 both to 400 or 300
u have to round anything 5+ up b/c then rounding cancels itself out in mass
ie if you round DOWN at 5, then anything ending in
0
1
2
3
4
5
is rounded DOWN
and anything ending in
6
7
8
9
is rounded up.
in aggregate this would push measurement down since there are more round-down #s than round-up
by rounding up when 5 u balance it out
...
.jpg)
