A tough call between A and D. I fell for A , but here is why I feel D should be the answer :
The point of contention is whether or not past perfect tense is justified in this case. It is not - because the two actions talked about : reduced and allowed are not in sequence here. Municipalities are still being allowed to draw after a reduced amount that was set in 1972. The sequencing is corrected by removing past perfect form. Hence option D.
The point of contention is whether or not past perfect tense is justified in this case. It is not - because the two actions talked about : reduced and allowed are not in sequence here. Municipalities are still being allowed to draw after a reduced amount that was set in 1972. The sequencing is corrected by removing past perfect form. Hence option D.
.jpg)







