Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: Achievers’ Administrative Officer: At Achievers’ School, students from

First part is not against the argument. It is something which is established and said to be true.

Second part is a reason/evidence given to disfavour or weaken the conclusion that underprivileged students are not receiving proper academic attention.

Hence I opt for D. Rest are incorrect.

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

---