ThanksAjiteshArun for your inputs
Hi Skywalker,
1. Thethat refers toa herbaceous plant from Eurasia . It cannot refer toleafy spurge as we want a specific type of plant, not a specific type of leafy spurge (which happens to be the name of a particular thing). For example:
(a)...farmland has been invaded by leafy spurge that affects cattle.
(b)...farmland has been invaded by leafy spurge, a plant that affects cattle.
2. Yes, there is both ambiguity and loss of meaning in this version. The sentence
...
AjiteshArun wrote:
Hi Skywalker,
1. Thethat refers toa herbaceous plant from Eurasia . It cannot refer toleafy spurge as we want a specific type of plant, not a specific type of leafy spurge (which happens to be the name of a particular thing). For example:
(a)...farmland has been invaded by leafy spurge that affects cattle.
(b)...farmland has been invaded by leafy spurge, a plant that affects cattle.
2. Yes, there is both ambiguity and loss of meaning in this version. The sentence
...
.jpg)
