The answer is (C).
We can solve this question using the
The argument can be summarised thusly: since vitamins in food have the same effect as vitamins in supplements, it is better to spend money in food. However, this argument is based on several assumptions, all of which we could question if we want toweaken : it assumes food is cheaper - maybe it isn't? it assumes food has more or the same amount of vitamins
...
We can solve this question using the
Logical
approach, since this is all about figuring ou the structure of the argument.The argument can be summarised thusly: since vitamins in food have the same effect as vitamins in supplements, it is better to spend money in food. However, this argument is based on several assumptions, all of which we could question if we want toweaken : it assumes food is cheaper - maybe it isn't? it assumes food has more or the same amount of vitamins
...
.jpg)
