GMATNinja ,daagh
I used to think, negating assumption should shatter the conclusion.
please clear my confusion.
Premise #1 – A > B (VO2 max) after moderate aerobic activity.
Conclusion: Runners will begin identical intensive training, A will continue to have greater V02 max.
Assumption: The effects of intensive training on the two runners are equivalent to the effects of moderate aerobic training.
(A) directly contradicts what is stated in the passage: Runner A had a greater
...
I used to think, negating assumption should shatter the conclusion.
please clear my confusion.
aragonn wrote:
Official Explanation:
Premise #1 – A > B (VO2 max) after moderate aerobic activity.
Conclusion: Runners will begin identical intensive training, A will continue to have greater V02 max.
Assumption: The effects of intensive training on the two runners are equivalent to the effects of moderate aerobic training.
(A) directly contradicts what is stated in the passage: Runner A had a greater
...
![VA – DVD-Audio Music Sampler Vol.2 (2003) [DVD-Audio ISO]](http://imghd.xyz/images/2026/05/13/4lSo1rN.jpg)
