I'm surprised LSAT questions have such flaws in their answers, especially those based on formal reasoning like this one. Not sure if the phrasing of the question - 'Which one of the followingcan be inferred' makes it ok but basic set theory shows that Option E does not follow logically.
Most can include 'all' too. While some clearly means greater than 0.
Still E is the best of the choices. Don't like that fact that LSAT makes some such lame jumps in logic, I thought only GMAT questions allow
...
Most can include 'all' too. While some clearly means greater than 0.
Still E is the best of the choices. Don't like that fact that LSAT makes some such lame jumps in logic, I thought only GMAT questions allow
...
