Quantcast
Channel: GMAT Club Forum - Forums > Reading Comprehension (RC)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that student-teacher

$
0
0
Elite097 wrote:

egmat KarishmaB GMATNinja why not E?

If the ratio is less means students < teachers and hence more difficult to admit teachers

2:1<3:1 so it means it will be difficult to get teaching job

If the ratio is in excess means there will be more scope to admit teachers

If 4:1>3:1 then they’ll need to increaseteachers



egmat wrote:
rohanGmat wrote:
I had a doubt about option (C)
I narrowed down to B/C - But C was kinda my prephrased answer so picked it anyway
My Reasoning For C
If the current student:teacher ratio is very low , for instance schools have 10 students and 50 teachers.. So in an economic recession, the school will not need to hire teachers - because the ratio will not increase above the limit
Would really appreciate if somene can guide how I should avoid such issues, i have encountered this multiple times....


Hi Rohan,

Let me try to address your doubt.

In all argument questions, it is very important to understand the conclusion very thoroughly. Let's look at the conclusion here:

Therefore,
...

Statistics : Posted by KarishmaB • on 20 Jun 2012, 20:31 • Replies 36 • Views 77456



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>