Lapetiteflo wrote:
I typically do not understand this kind of questions/answers. the only think I know from now on for the GMAT CR is that we need to pay attention to the words and here saying that 7% suffered 2 or more heart attacks does not help us in the argument concerning "a hear attack" ! maybe 20% of regular eater suffered a heart attack, among which 7%...
I am lot better for quant section and I have trouble to understand when we have to take care of the words in themselves ("only", "no",...) in answers or not. Here I answered C which was the best answer I thought and quite the opposite of the true OA. Could you explain that to me ?
Thanks!
NEVER consider KAPLAN source questions for your prep it is the most patheticsource .
In this option E if 7% people get attacks REGULARLY that leaves irregular attacks an assumption to be 0%.
if 7% regular + 0% irregular then it WEKANES
BUT IF 7% regular + even 5 % regular than it STRENGTHENS the argument so mark my words everyone
...
Statistics : Posted by Its_me_aka_ak • on 04 Jun 2012, 09:39 • Replies 16 • Views 14424
![[GET] Justin Leung – Content Academy 3.0 ($997.00)](http://i.imgur.com/YVZpmGa.png)
![Alice In Chains – Sap – EP [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Music/47/35/c7/mzi.ljwsgbez.jpg/592x592bb.webp)
![Chad Lawson – Awakening: The Stillness Within (2026) [FLAC 24bit/48kHz]](http://imghd.xyz/images/2026/05/09/x5d03jw9bi367_600.jpg)
