Quantcast
Channel: GMAT Club Forum - Forums > Reading Comprehension (RC)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Reading Comprehension (RC) | Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions du

$
0
0
GMATNinja wrote:

Kimberly77 wrote:
Hi[url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja%5D%5Bb%5DGMATNinja%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D, I thought question is asking the firms that are being bid and their stocks increased less value than the bidding firms? However E is opposite meaning that the bidding firm's stocks increased less value?
Could you kindly help clarify please? Thanks

According to the passage, during the 1970s and 1980s bidding firms differed from the firms for which they bid in that bidding firms

(A) tended to be more profi table before a merger than after a merger
(B) were more often concerned about the impact of acquisitions on national economies
(C) were run by managers whose actions were modeled on those of other managers
(D) anticipated greater economic advantages from prospective mergers
(E) experienced less of an increase in stock value when a prospective merger was announced

I suspect the confusion here might be more about terminology than anything else.
...

Statistics : Posted by Kimberly77 • on 12 Oct 2013, 10:50 • Replies 86 • Views 62239



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>