SnorLax_7 wrote:
Thank you so much MartyMurray for your kind response, so what I understand is that because nothing is mentioned about the other factors playing any role in sickness, we can't assume that.
Not exactly. There could be other factors as well, but maybe those other factors would not be able to cause sickness if genetic susceptibilities didn't exist.
Quote:
also when option is saying 'are in part' and not 'only in part'.
and How C is written is somehow making a connection between all human sickness and Gen. Vulner. or playing some role so that's why it should be the answer, obviously its negation devastating the conclusion.
Am i Correct in my thinking ?
Yes, you got it.
Statistics : Posted by MartyMurray • on 28 Dec 2006, 02:35 • Replies 11 • Views 25283
.jpg)
