Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: Last year in the United States, women who ran for state and national

Hello,

I am sorry but I think argument E is assumsing 1) that women want to run but they loose at the end (because of the lack of funding). Now how I understood theargument : Not because 2) they don't have fudning at first and then they don't participate in the elections at all. So, I think 1) is somehow also strenghtening the conclusion since very few women ran because they don't have funding (it doesn't matter because of what but still very few women ran).

To be eble to answer this confusion we need an information stating what was first, not participating at all because of funding or participating and loosing becaue of funding. these I think are very different. and even if you can't get funding that means you have difficult ywinning elections I don't see how this argument works. @‌bunnuelGMATNinja

Many more women than men who want to run for state and national offices do not because they cannot get adequate funding
...

Statistics : Posted by GMATNinja • on 23 Feb 2009, 17:59 • Replies 13 • Views 22703

---