Quantcast
Channel: GMAT Club Forum - Forums > Reading Comprehension (RC)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and

$
0
0
As the question stem says to weaken the conclusion, which is it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt. So, to weaken it the option we can say it is not upto the driver or passengers to decide whether they wear seat belt or not. And A exactly says that.
I am able to comprehend B also and I agree that it is harming others. But the question stem is saying to weaken the conclusion and not the argument as a whole.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>